YOUR
Search

    26.11.2020

    Duty of Notification under the German Foreign Trade and Payments Act and the German Foreign Trade Act and Payments Regulation


    In accordance with section 67 para. 1 of the German Foreign Trade and Payments Regulation (Außenwirtschaftsverordnung - "AWV"), notification of foreign payment transactions to the Deutsche Bundesbank (Central Bank of Germany) has been mandatory since September 2013. This is often disregarded or not known at all, particularly by young companies in the start-up phase, especially if, due to the company's field of business, sales are at first essentially made in Germany only. However, the duty of notification can already be triggered if, for instance, online advertising measures are assigned on search engines or social networks, as the companies concerned are usually not based in Germany. The violation of the duty of notification constitutes an administrative offence and can be sanctioned with a fine of up to EUR 30,000. Hence, at an early stage of business development, attention should be paid to corresponding foreign payment transactions and action should be taken accordingly.

     

    This contribution is intended to provide an overview of the mandatory notification duty in foreign trade and the consequences of a violation as well as the possibilities for its remedy in the past in the form of a voluntary disclosure, or its avoidance for the future.

     

    Duty of Notification

     

    According to section 67 para. 1 AWV, German nationals must notify the Deutsche Bundesbank of payment transactions which they receive from foreigners or on their behalf from German nationals (incoming payments), or make to foreigners or on their behalf to German nationals (outgoing payments). According to section 2 para. 15 no. 2 AWG, German nationals within the meaning of this standard are also legal entities domiciled in Germany. Thus, compliance with the duty of notification should be part of a company's corporate housekeeping.

     

    Section 67 AWV already defines exceptions to payment transactions that are not subject to the duty of notification. Accordingly, the following payment transactions are exempt from the duty of notification under section 67 para. 2 AWV:

     

    • Payments not exceeding the amount of EUR 12,500 or the equivalent in another currency ("exemption limit");
    • Payments for the import, export or shipment of goods;
    • Payments which involve the granting, borrowing or repayment of credits, including the creation and repayment of balances, with an originally agreed maturity or period of notice of not more than twelve months.

     

    Violation of the Duty of Notification

     

    Anyone who intentionally or negligently fails to submit the notifications pursuant to section 67 para. 1 AWV, or fails to submit the information correctly, completely or on time, is acting in breach of regulations pursuant to section 19 para. 3 no. 1b of the German Foreign Trade and Payments Act (Außenwirtschaftsgesetz – "AWG") in conjunction with section 81 para. 2 no. 19 AWV. The administrative offence can be sanctioned with a fine of up to EUR 30,000 (section 19 para. 6 AWG) although prosecution is at the discretion of the competent authority pursuant to section 47 para. 1 German Administrative Offences Act (Gesetz über Ordungswidrigkeiten – "OWiG"). It should be noted that not only the company subject to reporting can be prosecuted, but also the management and the employees responsible for reporting, if the appropriate conditions are met. Under certain circumstances, this may also apply to all former members of the management, provided that the notifications have also not been submitted during their employment. Rules on the statute of limitations set out in the OWiG are also likely to be of particular importance in this respect.

     

    Voluntary Disclosure exempting from Sanctions

     

    Section 22 para. 4 AWG provides for the possibility of a voluntary disclosure that exempts the company from sanctions. Accordingly, prosecution as an administrative offence is not required if the following conditions are cumulatively fulfilled:

     

    • Negligent violation within the meaning of section 19 para. 3 no. 1b AWG;
    • The violation must have been discovered by way of internal monitoring;
    • The violation must have been reported to the competent authority;
    • Appropriate measures must be taken to prevent a violation for the same reason;
    • The authority must not yet have started an investigation into the violation.

     

    Concusion

     

    A violation of the duty of notification according to section 67 AWV can be sanctioned with substantial fines. It is thus all the more noteworthy that this duty of notification is often not known in practice or is only treated negligently. The voluntary declaration exempting the company from sanctions can therefore be an important instrument to counteract high fines. We will be pleased to advise and support you in the event of possible violations of the duty of notification and any consequences for the past and the future.

     

    Benjamin Knorr / Robert Schmid

     

    ADVANT Beiten Advises Aesculap on Sale of TETEC AG to the Canadian Octane Group
    Dusseldorf, 26 June 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided interdisciplinary advice to Aesculap AG, a subsidiary of the B. Braun group seated in Melsungen, Germany, on the sale of its…
    Read more
    It is high time to prepare for the European CO₂ Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
    The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)1 has entered into force on 17 May 2023 and has been implemented gradually since October this year. The CBMA requires importers of iron, steel, cement,…
    Read more
    Venture Capital - Draft of the Federal Ministry of Economicy and Climate Protection for a Start-up-Strategy of t…
    Start-ups do finally receive the attention they deserve: On 1st June 2022 and for the first time, the German government presents targets and measures for a comprehensive start-up-strategy. The details stil…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Comer Industries on Takeover of Walterscheid Powertrain Group
    Berlin, 14 December 2021 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten together with ADVANT Nctm, Italy, has advised Comer Industries S. p. A., a leading global developer and manufacturer of mechat…
    Read more
    SPAC fever 2021: Recommendations for early-stage start-ups
    Special Purpose Acquisition Companies ("SPACs") are companies that are listed on the stock exchange as empty shells and are used to raise capital which, at some stage, is invested through a merger with an …
    Read more
    Will there soon be a new limited liability company form for start-ups? Next round of discussions start on the li…
    Many founders of start-ups wish to ensure during the establishment phase or at an early stage that the company will be directed in “steward ownership”. This means that the capital of the company and the pr…
    Read more
    2021 Update – An overview of the most important labour law updates for start-ups
    2021 does (not) make everything new. However, a few new developments in labour law are also relevant for start-ups. Dr Michaela Felisiak LLM and Dr Erik Schmid outline the most important labour law news: …
    Read more
    EU First – Venture Capital Funds, Start-ups and the German Foreign Investment Control
    The draft bill of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) dated 22 January 2021 for the 17th Amendment of the German Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance underlines that the Germ…
    Read more
    The New German Competition Law: What’s in It for Start-ups and VC?
    Since the middle of January, Germany has had a new competition law designed to take account of the increasing digitalisation of the economy. For start-ups, this new competition law means simpler access to …
    Read more