YOUR
Search

    28.03.2021

    Dismissal of an employee after serious racist remarks lawful


    Press Release of Dusseldorf Regional Labour Court dated 23 March 2021

     

    If an employee insults his colleagues with statements such as: "I wished for a gas chamber, but I didn't get it. The Turks should be thrown into the fire and have their heads cut off", even his recognised severe disability does not protect him from being dismissed. The employee believed himself to be "untouchable" and "unterminable" on the basis of his disability - and was wrong.

     

    What happened?

     

    The employee had already insulted his colleagues from Turkey as "oil eyes", "niggers" and "subjects". After approval by the Integration Office, the employer terminated the employment relationship with the employee, who then filed an action for unfair dismissal. The 5th Division of the Dusseldorf Regional Labour Court dismissed the action in its judgment of 10 December 2020.

     

    Dismissal due to severe racist insults effective

     

    According to the Regional Labour Court, the dismissal was socially justified due to the statements made to the colleagues and the employment relationship was effectively terminated. The terms "oil eyes", "niggers" and "subjects" all constitute unacceptable offensive remarks. The employee's serious misconduct finally culminated in the employee's national-socialist inhumane statement in response to the completely innocuous question of the work colleague as to what he had received for Christmas. According to the judges, a prior warning was unreasonable in view of the seriousness of the misconduct and the weighing of interests was also to the employee's disadvantage despite his severe disability.

     

    Addressing racism in the labour courts

     

    Racist remarks in the workplace constitute unacceptable insults that result in termination of employment. The ruling discussed here is reminiscent of last year's "Ugha, Ugha!" decision by the Federal Constitutional Court. The judges in Karlsruhe drew a line under a constitutional complaint by an employee against his extraordinary dismissal because of inhumane remarks (here you can find the press release). The employee had previously imitated his dark-skinned colleague with monkey sounds.

     

    The decisions raise awareness that racism is also pervasive in the workplace and employers are well advised to prevent racist behaviour from its very beginnings.


    Dr Kathrin Bürger

    Anne-Kathrin von Dahlen

     

    ADVANT Beiten Advises the Herder Publishin…
    Freiburg, 6 August 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has advised H…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Aesculap on Sale of TETEC AG to the Canadian Octane Group
    Dusseldorf, 26 June 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided interdisciplinary advice to Aesculap AG, a subsidiary of the B. Braun group seated in Melsungen, Germany, on the sale of its…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises COMEM Group on Acquisition of Weidmann Technologies Deutschland
    Berlin, 2 April 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has comprehensively advised COMEM S.p.A., headquartered in Italy, on the acquisition of all shares in Weidmann Technologies Deutschland GmbH,…
    Read more
    Adacta and ADVANT Beiten Advise EBARA on the Acquisition of a Business Division of SKF
    Munich, 24 July 2023 - The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has advised EBARA Pumps Europe S.p.A. (EPE), part of the Japanese EBARA Corporation (EBARA), on the acquisition of the business di…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises astragon Entertainment on Takeover of Independent Arts
    Frankfurt am Main, 8 May 2023 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided legal advice to astragon Entertainment GmbH, Dusseldorf, a subsidiary of Team17 Group PLC, on the takeover of Independe…
    Read more
    Equal pay for men and women: negotiating skills are not an objective differentiation criterion
    Judgment of the Federal Labour Court of 16 February 2023 in Case No. 8 AZR 450/21
    Read more
    Social selection: how close an employee is to retirement can be considered to the employee’s detriment
    Judgment of the Federal Labour Court of 8 December 2022 in Case No. 6 AZR 31/22 (Press release) When performing the social selection to determine which employment relationships will be terminated for op…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten advises Cipla (EU) Limited on its investment in Ethris GmbH
    Berlin, 25 January 2023 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided comprehensive legal advice to Cipla (EU) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cipla Limited (“Cipla”), headquartered in Mumb…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Wienerberger on acquiring significant part of French Terreal Group’s business
    Berlin, 11 January 2023 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten advises the leading international manufacturer of building materials and infrastructure solutions, Wienerberger AG, on acquiring major bus…
    Read more