YOUR
Search

    30.01.2025

    Innovation, decarbonization, security - but simpler, lighter, faster


    This is how you could summarize the so-called Competitiveness Compass presented by the EU Commission on January 29, 2025 (EU Compass to regain competitiveness). It defines the strategic framework for the EU Commission's work over the next five years. The goal: to boost the EU economy.

    The underlying analysis by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at a press briefing is interesting: "Our business model has basically relied on cheap labor, from China presumably, cheap energy from Russia and partially outsourcing security and security investment. These days are gone."

    The consequence of this: the EU Commission's plans for the three core areas of action: innovation, decarbonization and security, which are based on the recommendations of the Draghi report and described in more detail in the Compass. The Commission's aim is to make Europe the place where tomorrow's technologies, services, and clean products are invented, produced and marketed, while staying on course for climate neutrality. The Compass thus provides a first perspective on the question of whether the ESG topic is facing an end in light of the current political developments in the EU (for some basic thoughts on this, see our blog post Is this the End for ESG? | ADVANT Beiten). At least from the perspective of the compass, it appears rather unlikely that the transformation of the economy as such will be put on hold for the time being.

    What is obviously set to change significantly, however, are the means: In the Compass, the EU Commission describes five so-called "horizontal enablers for competitiveness" with which it intends to achieve its goals in the three pillars of innovation, decarbonization and security. The first enabler, "simplification", is particularly relevant from a regulatory perspective, as it aims to drastically reduce regulatory and administrative burdens. This simplification is complemented by the reduction of barriers to the Single Market, the idea of a "European Savings and Investment Union" to finance the whole project, the promotion of skills and quality jobs and better coordination of policies at EU and national level.

    The aspect of simplification mentioned in the Compass obviously requires a fundamental change. The EU Commission itself wants to make progress here and has already announced a first series of "Simplification Omnibus packages" for February 2025. One - and also the first - omnibus is to cover far-reaching simplification in the fields of sustainability finance reporting, sustainability due diligence and taxonomy. This refers to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Taxonomy Regulation. The EU Commission had already announced facilitations in this regard following the Budapest Declaration on the "New European Competitiveness Deal" last fall. According to the agenda for the upcoming Commission meeting on February 26, 2025, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen herself is now responsible for the corresponding agenda item "Omnibus package: Chapeau communication and omnibus proposal" alongside Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné. This may reflect the political importance of this project and the many demands made on it (e.g. by the EPP as well as the German and French governments).

    A first indication of the content of this "first omnibus" can already be found in the Compass: In order to ensure that regulation is proportionate to the size of the company, the EU Commission intends to propose a definition for a new category of company, the so-called "small micaps". These are to be companies that are larger than SMEs but smaller than large companies. The EU Commission announces that "thousands of companies in the EU will benefit from a tailored regulatory simplification in the spirit as SMEs". This could mean that the scope of application of the CSRD, which currently includes all large corporations as defined in Section 267 (3) of the German Commercial Code (HGB) from January 1, 2025, will be narrowed accordingly.

    What does this mean for companies? As a rule, the implementation of the announced simplifications by the respective legislator alone will not be sufficient. In a second step, these simplifications will have to be implemented by the individual companies. The extent to which the processes set up by the respective company can and should be adapted in a meaningful way will have to be examined. The mere removal of a legal requirement does not automatically render an established process obsolete. To illustrate: If, for example, the obligation of the management board of a listed stock corporation to establish an appropriate internal control system (ICS) and risk management system (RMS), which was included in Section 91 (3) of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) in the wake of the Wirecard scandal, were to be repealed, it would be unwise to immediately abolish the ICS and RMS completely. However, it remains useful and necessary to keep an eye on what regulatory simplifications will result from the changes announced by the EU Commission over time, and how these can then be translated into corresponding simplifications in internal processes. Companies would have more room for maneuver, at least as long as it is ensured that decisions can be made on the basis of appropriate information, including ESG aspects where relevant. It therefore seems unlikely that ESG issues will cease to play a role for companies. On the contrary, the transformation of the economy and the resulting opportunities and risks for the business models of almost all companies remain on the agenda.

    Dr Daniel Walden
    Dr André Depping

    Is this the End for ESG?
    20 January 2025 undoubtedly was a significant day. Donald Trump, the old and new…
    Read more
    Latest news on energy law: changes as of 1 January 2025
    Dear readers, The year 2025 will be at least as dynamic as the years before whe…
    Read more
    Why we (in particular the management) need to continue to take the German LkSG seriously and how it (also) relates to the pending implementation of the CSRD
    The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz,…
    Read more
    New: The Regulation on the prohibition of products made with forced labour ("Forced Labour Regulation")
    On 19.11.2024, after the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union …
    Read more
    EU Supply Chain Act finalized - relevant for companies worldwide
    It did indeed take quite a while. And there was indeed a lot of back and forth. But now, it is final and binding: Today, the European Council gave its final green light for the so-called EU Corporate Sust…
    Read more
    EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive - Agreement and Text
    A compromise has been found for the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. It seems to have the support of the necessary majorities, although Germany continues to abstain. You can find the pr…
    Read more
    European Supply Chain Act close to finalization
    Historic breakthrough in the trilogue negotiations on the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD): On 14 December 2023, the negotiators from the Parliament and Council reached an initia…
    Read more
    European Parliament in support of plans for an European Supply Chain Due Diligence Act
    On June 1, 2023 the European Parliament resolved by large majority vote to adopt its position for the upcoming negotiations with regard to the proposed Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSD…
    Read more