YOUR
Search

    08.04.2020

    Period of the Retroactive Effect for Restructuring Measures extended – Does this also apply for tax purposes as part of the German Reorganisation Tax Act?


    On 27 March 2020, the law for the Mitigation of the Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Civil, Insolvency and Criminal Proceedings Law was announced in the Federal Law Gazette (BGBl. I 2020, page 569). Among other things, the retroaction under commercial law in case of restructuring measures for the year 2020 was extended from eight to twelve months, although adaptations in the Reorganisation Tax Act (UmwStG) were not made in this context. This may result in complications.

     

    You can find a detailed version of this article under the "Tax Law" tab in our Coronavirus Informationscenter.

     

    Does the extension apply to the period of the retroactive effect for restructuring measures for tax purposes as part of the German Reorganisation Tax Act?

     

    In case of restructuring measures pursuant to the German Law Regulating Transformation of Companies (UmwG) according to section 17 (2) sent. 4 UmwG the following applies in many cases: the decisive closing balance sheet has been prepared as per a cut-off date preceding the application for entry in the register by no more than eight (8) months.

     

    In accordance with the Law on Measures in Corporate, Cooperative, Association, Foundation and Property Ownership Law to combat the effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the final balance sheet under commercial law within the meaning of section 17 (2) sent. 4 UmwG may, in deviation from this, be prepared as per a cut-off date not more than twelve months prior to the date of application. This is valid for applications in the year 2020.

     

    In the relevant documentation, no reference was made to a possible or even necessary adaptation of the provisions of the UmwStG. As a result, it is possible that the basic synchronisation of the Transformation Law and Reorganisation Tax Law cannot be implemented completely.

     

    In our opinion, the adopted twelve-month period should be extended for tax purposes for mergers under sections 3 et seq. and sections 11 et seq. UmwStG as well as split-ups and spin-offs pursuant to sections 15, 16 UmwStG, since section 2 UmwStG applies and is based on section 17 UmwG with regard to the retroactive effect on the final balance sheet under commercial law.

     

    The situation is problematic though in the case of spin-offs pursuant to sections 20, 24 UmwStG and legal form transformations in accordance with sections 9, 25 UmwStG, as the standards contain a separate provision on retroactivity (eight months). In this respect, we recommend that the eight-month period should first be included in any planning and coordinated with the competent tax office.

     

    Final clarity as to whether the twelve-month period under the new law is also to apply generally for tax purposes will probably not be achieved in future until the legislator adopts (interim) adaptations to the UmwStG in line with the Law for the Mitigation of the Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Civil, Insolvency and Criminal Proceedings Law or until the German Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) makes a respective statement in writing. Otherwise, it is possible that some restructuring measures may already fail due to the lack of adaptations of the UmwStG.

     

    BEITEN BURKHARDT will be pleased to support you in the planning and execution of the legal transformation and the coordination with the fiscal authorities.

     

    Dr Karl-Dieter Müller

     

    Benjamin Knorr

     

    Dragan Skrebic

     

     

     

     

     

    Protecting Yourself Tax-wise Instead of Paying Extra: What the New Federal Fiscal Court Ruling Means for Corporate Financing
    In its judgment of 1.4.2026 (I R 11/24), the Federal Fiscal Court ruled on the…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Ningbo Cixing on the acquisition of selected STOLL assets from KARL MAYER
    Berlin, 25 June 2026 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten partnered with Island Green Capital on Stake in Isar Aerospace
    Berlin, 12 June 2026 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided…
    Read more
    DTA Netherlands: Changes from 01.01.2026 for employees and dividends
    Since 1 January 2026, the new double taxation agreement between Germany and the…
    Read more
    Federal Fiscal Court: Variable components of the purchase price – capital gain or wages?
    When selling a company, the purchase price often depends partly on certain…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann on the Splitting of Klinikum Westbrandenburg GmbH into Two Sites
    Berlin, 13 April 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann on the Sale of its Majority Stake in Lausitz Klinik Forst GmbH
    Berlin, 26 March 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more
    EU Commission Presents Proposal for ‘EU Inc.’
    When European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen introduced the concept…
    Read more
    Consequential issues arising from the upward tainting of an originally asset-managing partnership – even in the absence of trade tax liability
    If an asset-managing partnership participates (vermögensverwaltende…
    Read more