YOUR
Search

    23.11.2020

    The Probationary Period during the Corona Pandemic


    The corona pandemic is dominating life,

    There must be no contact with friends,

    the author therefore stays at home,

    and his blog appears in German rhymes.

     

    No more pizza at the Italian restaurant around the corner,

    No tarte flambée with bacon at the inn,

    Nobody leaves a bar drunk anymore,

    But not only leisure time is affected.

     

    The Corona pandemic affects everyone,

    Dear readers, unfortunately also the working life,

    Mass dismissal, hiring freeze and short-time work,

    Home office is spreading in companies.

     

    The workplace moves from the company premises

    For hygiene reasons into your own four walls,

    No suit at the office, but at home in jeans,

    No meetings in then office but webex, zoom and teams.

     

    Restrictions by Covid-19 have been in effect since March,

    For newly hired employees this is no joke,

    At home alone since his/her first day at work,

    Not even among colleagues in the canteen for a break.

     

    A problem may emerge after six months,

    How can new employees survive the probationary period?

    It is simply not possible to test the employee well,

    for the employment relationship from the 7th month onwards, this would be fatal.

     

    Only during the probationary period can the employer

    Insist on the short notice period of two weeks,

    Is extending the probationary period the bright idea?

    No, extension is inadmissible as stated in Section 622 (3) German Civil Code.

     

    Extending the probationary period would not help much either,

    The German Protection Against Unfair Dismissals Act begins to apply after six months,

    Permitted terminations must then state a reason,

    Otherwise the employer cannot part with the employee.

     

    The solution I have in mind is an old acquaintance,

    Things get more relaxed during corona around the probationary period.

    Termination before the end of the probationary period is recommended

    and then choose two or three months more testing.

    The maximum six-month probationary period must be outwitted

    And "limited" by a long period of notice for a few months.

     

    Best wishes from the Labour & Employment Law Practice Group, and stay healthy!

     

    Yours Dr Erik Schmid

     

    Note: This blog has already been posted in the employment law blog of Erik Schmid at Rehm-Verlag (www.rehm-verlag.de).

     

    ADVANT Beiten Advises Aesculap on Sale of TETEC AG to the Canadian Octane Group
    Dusseldorf, 26 June 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided interdisciplinary advice to Aesculap AG, a subsidiary of the B. Braun group seated in Melsungen, Germany, on the sale of its…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises COMEM Group on Acquisition of Weidmann Technologies Deutschland
    Berlin, 2 April 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has comprehensively advised COMEM S.p.A., headquartered in Italy, on the acquisition of all shares in Weidmann Technologies Deutschland GmbH,…
    Read more
    Adacta and ADVANT Beiten Advise EBARA on the Acquisition of a Business Division of SKF
    Munich, 24 July 2023 - The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has advised EBARA Pumps Europe S.p.A. (EPE), part of the Japanese EBARA Corporation (EBARA), on the acquisition of the business di…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises astragon Entertainment on Takeover of Independent Arts
    Frankfurt am Main, 8 May 2023 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided legal advice to astragon Entertainment GmbH, Dusseldorf, a subsidiary of Team17 Group PLC, on the takeover of Independe…
    Read more
    Equal pay for men and women: negotiating skills are not an objective differentiation criterion
    Judgment of the Federal Labour Court of 16 February 2023 in Case No. 8 AZR 450/21
    Read more
    Social selection: how close an employee is to retirement can be considered to the employee’s detriment
    Judgment of the Federal Labour Court of 8 December 2022 in Case No. 6 AZR 31/22 (Press release) When performing the social selection to determine which employment relationships will be terminated for op…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten advises Cipla (EU) Limited on its investment in Ethris GmbH
    Berlin, 25 January 2023 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided comprehensive legal advice to Cipla (EU) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cipla Limited (“Cipla”), headquartered in Mumb…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Wienerberger on acquiring significant part of French Terreal Group’s business
    Berlin, 11 January 2023 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten advises the leading international manufacturer of building materials and infrastructure solutions, Wienerberger AG, on acquiring major bus…
    Read more
    Federal Labour Court publishes judgment on the recording of working time – duty to act and co-decision right
    Judgment of the Federal Labour Court of 13 September 2022 in Case No. 1 ABR 22/21 Employers must record the beginning, end and duration of the daily working time of employees, and do not have a grace pe…
    Read more