YOUR
Search

    11.04.2021

    Federal Ministry of Finance publishes letter of guidance on the application of rules regarding reportable cross-border arrangements


    The publication of the letter of guidance dated 29 March 2021 is largely an affirmation of the views taken in the draft dated 14 July 2020.

     

    Key facts

     

    With its Act on the "Implementation of Reporting Obligations of Cross-Border Arrangements" dated 21 December 2019, Germany has complied with its duty to implement EU Council Directive 2018/822 of 25 May 2018.

     

    After some initial back and forth on an extension of the deadlines regarding the reporting obligations due to the Corona Pandemic, which were finally abandoned, the application of the reporting obligations started as scheduled, on 1 July 2020. The new legislation had already caused heated discussions prior to implementation due to its broad scope.

     

    The letter of guidance by the FMF was eagerly awaited as to shed some light on the administration's interpretation of the new legislation. In the past year the FMF had circulated multiple drafts of the letter of guidance, the latest on 14 July 2020. Now, almost nine months later, the FMF has finally published the final letter of guidance on 29 March 2021. The changes in comparison to the latest draft of 14 July 2020 are, however, in most part of editorial nature. This is also the case with regard to the so called "White List" in the Annex which contains a conclusive listing of cases which are deemed not to constitute a tax benefit as such.

     

    Criticism of the reporting obligations as a bureaucratic monster that is difficult to manage is thus unlikely to abate even after the publication of the FMF letter of guidance.

     

    Practical Implications

     

    The publication of the final letter of guidance only provides for very limited additional insight into the fiscal authorities' perspective in comparison to the last draft circulated on 14 July 2020. However, the publication is nevertheless to be welcomed, as the administration is for now bound by the views stated in the letter and in particular the White List.

     

    Dr. Marion Frotscher

     

    Simon Bauer

     

    Protecting Yourself Tax-wise Instead of Paying Extra: What the New Federal Fiscal Court Ruling Means for Corporate Financing
    In its judgment of 1.4.2026 (I R 11/24), the Federal Fiscal Court ruled on the…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Ningbo Cixing on the acquisition of selected STOLL assets from KARL MAYER
    Berlin, 25 June 2026 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten partnered with Island Green Capital on Stake in Isar Aerospace
    Berlin, 12 June 2026 - The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided…
    Read more
    DTA Netherlands: Changes from 01.01.2026 for employees and dividends
    Since 1 January 2026, the new double taxation agreement between Germany and the…
    Read more
    Federal Fiscal Court: Variable components of the purchase price – capital gain or wages?
    When selling a company, the purchase price often depends partly on certain…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann on the Splitting of Klinikum Westbrandenburg GmbH into Two Sites
    Berlin, 13 April 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann on the Sale of its Majority Stake in Lausitz Klinik Forst GmbH
    Berlin, 26 March 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more
    EU Commission Presents Proposal for ‘EU Inc.’
    When European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen introduced the concept…
    Read more
    Consequential issues arising from the upward tainting of an originally asset-managing partnership – even in the absence of trade tax liability
    If an asset-managing partnership participates (vermögensverwaltende…
    Read more