YOUR
Search

    21.09.2020

    Cross-border Company Conversion of a German GmbH and Relocation of the Registered Office to Another EU Member State


    It is now undisputedly permitted to transfer the registered office of a German GmbH to another EU member state while simultaneously changing into a legal form under the law of the country of relocation (known in German as "Herausformwechsel") ("Company Conversion").

     

    Initial situation

     

    In practice, the possibility of Company Conversion is used more and more often. Unlike other forms of transformation (e.g. cross-border mergers), the Company Conversion has the advantage that it preserves identity and does not involve a transfer of assets. Consequently, as a rule, no real estate transfer tax becomes payable, no hidden reserves must be disclosed, there is no violation of holding periods, and public law approvals remain valid for the company.

     

    Reasons for a Company Conversion are usually a better market environment and more favourable legal circumstances in the country of conversion, sometimes even a more attractive tax environment, more favourable regulations for employee participation and sometimes a simplified handling of insolvencies and liquidations.

     

    Despite the undisputed admissibility of the Company Conversion, its practical implementation is currently still difficult due to the lack of a legally regulated procedure.

     

    With the Company Law Package (EU Directive) which came into force on 1 January 2020, uniform EU regulations had been created for the first time, including a procedure for the Company Conversion. However, as these provisions of the Company Law Package do not have to be transposed into national law by the German legislator until 31 January 2023, the question arises as to whether these EU requirements must nevertheless already be observed now due to a so-called "pre-effect" when advising on and structuring Company Conversions.

     

    This question was first addressed (as far as apparent) by the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken in its decision of 7 January 2020. 

     

    The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken dated 7 January 2020

     

    The Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Saarbruecken had to decide on a company conversion of a German GmbH into the legal form of a French corporation. The application for this Company Conversion had been rejected by the Local Court of Saarbruecken on the grounds that the preparation of a transformation report and the announcement of the draft transformation resolution could not be waived in view of the protection of creditors and employees.

     

    In its decision, the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken confirmed the opinion of the Local Court of Saarbruecken and decided that ‑ due to the lack of national regulations on Company Conversions ‑ in addition to the regulations on the domestic change of legal form (§§ 190 et seq. of the German Reorganisation Act, UmwG), the regulations on cross-border mergers (§§ 122 (a) et seq. UmwG) and not, as had been discussed for a long time, the regulations on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of a European Corporation (so-called SE-Regulation) are applicable.

     

    In its reasoning, the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken considers this result to be appropriate in anticipation of the new regulations on Company Conversion under the Company Law Package, and thus assigns a pre-effect to the Company Law Package even before its transposition into national law.

     

    Assessment

     

    In both consulting practice and in literature, the decision of the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken has often been criticised. According to the prevailing opinion, there is no obligation to consider the EU Directive before the deadline for an implementation into national law as determined in the Company Law Package expires.

     

    Critics claim that rather than contributing to legal certainty, the Higher Regional Court of Saarbruecken has, by its decision, further increased the already existing legal uncertainty with regard to the procedure for Company Conversions.

     

    For the consulting practice this means that it is still indispensable to coordinate the procedural steps necessary for Company Conversions early on with the competent registry court.

     

    As an alternative, it should be considered to observe the additional procedural requirements under the Company Law Package ‑ as a precautionary measure ‑ until the highest German court clarifies the matter, or the EU Directive has been implemented in national law.

     

    In addition to a legal implementation of a Company Conversion, we are also pleased to support you in determining whether a Company Conversion is a viable option for your company and what tax consequences would arise.

     

    Legal status: 21 September 2020

     

    Petra Bolle

     

    Volker Szpak

     

    ADVANT Advises Pidigi S.p.A. on the Acquisition of Key Assets of Sympatex Technologies GmbH from Insolvency Proceedings
    Munich, 5 May 2026 – ADVANT Beiten has assisted the Italian firm Pidigi S.p.A.…
    Read more
    Start of first biologics rebate agreements: ADVANT Beiten advises spectrumK
    Berlin, 4 June 2026 - Effective 1 June 2026, spectrumK's first exclusive…
    Read more
    New Chinese Outbound Investment Regulations: Opportunities Through Compliance for Chinese Investors in Germany
    On June 1, 2026, Chinese Premier Li Qiang signed the State Council Order…
    Read more
    The EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation and the Chinese "Blocking" Response: Navigating the Escalating Tensions Between Brussels and Beijing
    Introduction: A New Era of Legal Confrontation in EU-China Trade Relations The…
    Read more
    New Law: Directive on Repair of Goods Also Applies to Importers!
    Importers should be aware that consumers will have a right to have defective…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises DGQ in Connection with Montagu Becoming a Majority Shareholder in DQS
    Frankfurt, 7 May 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more
    The EU-Mercosur Agreement as of May 1, 2026: Tariff Benefits and New Requirements for Businesses
    With the trade policy chapter of the EU-Mercosur Agreement entering into force…
    Read more
    China's New Counter-Sanctions Rules: Growing Risks for Global Companies
    China's new counter-sanctions regulations (Regulations No. 834 and 835)…
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann on the Splitting of Klinikum Westbrandenburg GmbH into Two Sites
    Berlin, 13 April 2026 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has…
    Read more