YOUR
Search

    23.01.2024

    ADVANT Beiten Advises ENGIE New Ventures on a Further Investment in INERATEC in the Context of a Series B Financing

    Press Releases

    Freiburg, 24 January 2024 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided comprehensive legal advice to ENGIE New Ventures, the venture capital fund of the global energy supplier ENGIE, for the Series B financing of INERATEC, a pioneer in the development and production of synthetic fuels.

     

    The Series B venture capital financing totalling USD 129 million is led by US investor Piva Capital with additional international participation from HG Ventures, TDK Ventures, Copec WIND Ventures, RockCreek, Emerald and Samsung Ventures as well as increased support from existing investors including ENGIE New Ventures, Safran Corporate Ventures and Honda.

     

    INERATEC, which was founded in Karlsruhe in 2016, will use the capital to further accelerate the commercialisation of CO2-neutral e-fuels. Specifically, INERATEC plans to convert 1 GW of renewable energy into 165,000 tons of sustainable e-fuels by 2030, thus initiating the next era of mobility.

     

    The ENGIE Group is listed on Paris and Brussels stock exchange. Its venture capital fund ENGIE New Ventures makes minority investments in innovative start-ups that bring strategic value to the Group, with a specific focus on future disruptive technologies. Since 2014, it has invested in over 50 solutions in the cleantech sector. ENGIE New Ventures has already invested in INERATEC as lead investor in 2022 as part of a Series A financing; also with legal support from the lead partner Christian Burmeister.

     

    Advisor to ENGIE New Ventures:

    ADVANT Beiten: Christian Burmeister (lead partner, Freiburg/Berlin) and Damien Heinrich (Freiburg, both Corporate/M&A).

     

    Public Relations

    Frauke Reuther

    Manager Kommunikation

    ADVANT Beiten

    +49 (69) 75 60 95 - 570

    frauke.reuther@advant-beiten.com

     

    German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) conf…
    A vote cast contrary to a voting commitment is valid, even if all shareholders e…
    Read more
    All gone: retroactive withdrawal of the ma…
    The retroactive and complete withdrawal of a non-competition compensation in the…
    Read more
    General meeting: ban on bringing devices s…
    Shareholders may not generally be prohibited from merely carrying mobile phones …
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Dusseldorf-Based MedTech Company CUREosity Again on Financing Round
    Dusseldorf, 2 July 2024 – The international commercial law firm ADVANT Beiten has advised CUREosity GmbH, Dusseldorf, on a growth financing round which brought the medtech company a total of approximately …
    Read more
    ADVANT Beiten Advises Aesculap on Sale of TETEC AG to the Canadian Octane Group
    Dusseldorf, 26 June 2024 – The international law firm ADVANT Beiten has provided interdisciplinary advice to Aesculap AG, a subsidiary of the B. Braun group seated in Melsungen, Germany, on the sale of its…
    Read more
    Infringement of Shareholders' Attendance Rights
    Schleswig Higher Regional Court (OLG), judgment of 07 February 2024 – 9 U 41/23 The right of shareholders to attend the annual general meeting (AGM) of a stock corporation is a fundamental and generally a…
    Read more
    EU Supply Chain Act finalized - relevant for companies worldwide
    It did indeed take quite a while. And there was indeed a lot of back and forth. But now, it is final and binding: Today, the European Council gave its final green light for the so-called EU Corporate Sust…
    Read more
    Liability of Managing Director Despite Formal Approval of Past Actions?
    Brandenburg Higher Regional Court, judgment of 24 January 2024 – 7 U 2/23 A managing director is personally liable to the company if the director negligently or wilfully violates their responsibilities, r…
    Read more
    Boycotting the Supervisory Board by Permanent Absence? – Federal Court of Justice Rejects Appointment by Court
    The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) takes the stance that a supervisory board member boycotting the board by repeatedly being absent does not give rise to the right to have an additional member appoi…
    Read more